The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The marina branch business in the judgment of the court below, which was operated by the defendant of mistake of facts (hereinafter "the marina branch business in this case"), is not a commercial arrangement, but a general marina branch business, and the defendant does not arrange an employee to act of similarity.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (fine 5 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination:

A. We examine the assertion of mistake of facts, i.e., the following circumstances that can be recognized by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, i.e., the fact that E was a customer at the time of regulating the marina business of this case, i.e., the fact that E was made by a police officer while he was her by hand, and she was investigated by the police after 3 days from E, while she was investigated by the police, she should be her own clothes with female employees, and she should be her head and her head after her head, and her head her head her head her head 's head her head her head her head her head her head her head her head her head her head her head her head her head her head her head her head her head her head her head her head her head her with 30 minutes, and her head her head her head her head her he/she was aware of the similarity of this case's head 314.

B. As to the assertion of unfair sentencing, it is favorable for the defendant to have no record of punishment for the same crime.

However, the act of arranging sexual traffic is harmful to the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex.