logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.06.21 2017고정73
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person who operates a marina business with the trade name, “E Maz” located on the second floor of the D Building 206, Seocheon-si.

On August 8, 2016, the Defendant: (a) received KRW 100,00 from F, a customer, who found his place at the above marina business place; and (b) arranged that female employees B, who are female employees, may stimulate the above F’s sexual organ by hand, to engage in the act of similarity that stimulates the situation.

2. Defendant B stated partial revision of the facts charged to the extent that he does not interfere with the exercise of the Defendant’s right to defense as a person working as an employee at the above marina business establishment;

On August 8, 2016, sexual traffic was conducted by means of similarity that stimulates the sexual organ of customer F in his/her hand at the above-mentioned marina business establishment.

[Defendants and defense counsel do not deny the crime by engaging in or arranging sexual traffic with F by means of similarity.

However, comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, Defendant B engaged in sexual traffic by means of similarity that may stimulate F’s sexual organ by hand around August 8, 2016, and Defendant A may recognize the fact that Defendant A arranged it.

(a) Any statement made by the F in an investigative agency is reliable, and F is false in tending and making a false statement that F is not in an investigative agency;

It is difficult to doubt.

① On August 22, 2016, F controlled math from female employees G (one person H). On the same day, F was receiving a normal marina, but around August 8, 2016, F received the similarity from female employees Defendant B (one person) at the instant establishment around August 16:00.

was stated.

Accordingly, on August 8, 2016, the police and the Defendants were voluntarily accompanied to the police station for the suspicion of sexual traffic.

2. F is on the ground that he/she can accurately specify the date on which he/she performs the act of similarity at the instant establishment.

arrow