beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.
Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who works as an employee in the E-Sa located in the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Building C.
At around June 7, 2016, the Defendant, in collusion with D, received 100,000 won from F in the above E-Sa site from F, and entered the two rooms, and caused the math to f, thereby engaging in sexual intercourse between about 20 minutes and 20 minutes by means of shade below the above f.
Summary of Evidence
1. Legal statement of witness F;
1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect concerning F by the prosecution;
1. Police seizure records;
1. Determination on the assertion of the defendant and his/her defense counsel attached to field photographs
1. The summary of the assertion is the date and place stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment, and there is no fact that the defendant committed the act of similarity only with F.
2. The judgment F stated to the effect that he appeared as a witness in this Court and sculed as a witness, and that he committed an act of similarity with the Defendant as stated in the facts constituting the offense in
Examining the statements made by the investigation agency of one Part F on June 7, 2016, the F made a statement that “after the police was controlled on June 7, 2016, the E-mail sent out around 21:10, 2016, and the E-mail operated by the Defendant was placed, and the E-mail was set up until 21:50 on the same day, and 20 minutes thereafter, the F made a statement to the effect that “The E-mail was caught by hand and scam for 20 minutes,” and that “the police interrogation was carried out by an employee on June 14, 2016, and the said statement was reversed.” On July 20, 2016, the F made a statement to the effect that “the employee was scambling by scambling his sexual organ and did not scambling his sexual organ with the employee, but did not have any similarity with the previous employee’s scambling act.”
The F is drawn up by the police.