logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2018.11.27 2018가단58339
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 5,00,000 as well as 5% per annum from September 28, 2017 to November 27, 2018 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1.The following facts of recognition do not conflict between the parties, or may be recognized by taking into account each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 4, 6, 10, and Eul evidence No. 1 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the whole purport of the pleadings:

The plaintiff, who was married with C on February 27, 2004, has one child between C and C.

B. The defendant was a person working in the same workplace as C while working in the workplace.

C. On June 10, 2016, the Defendant sent a text message to C to the effect that the situation in which C is communicating with D, “I see where I am.”

In addition, on September 10, 2017, the Defendant sent C e-mail to the effect that “I swear that I will not see the assistant principal in mind, with a view to understanding, communicating, expressing, and sparing D and d).”

On September 28, 2017, the Defendant sent text messages to the Plaintiff to the effect that “The Plaintiff promised not to meet with C on June 10, 2016, but was made a telephone call on November 2016, and thereafter, the Defendant did not contact with C, but did not comply with the Plaintiff’s promise to not contact with C. It is sent as a crime.”

E. C committed unlawful act with D in the same workplace.

On May 30, 2018, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit claiming damages against D by the Seogu District Court 2017Kadan5929, which was rendered judgment in favor of the Plaintiff on May 30, 2018.

2. Determination

A. In light of the following circumstances revealed by the above fact of recognition as to the recognized portion, namely, sending text messages and e-mail to C, which combine the remaining parts with D, and the Defendant sent the e-mail premised on the premise that C and C are the one’s spouse, there was emotional ties between the Defendant and C. The Defendant, knowing that C is a spouse, infringed upon the Plaintiff’s marital relationship by committing an unlawful act.

arrow