1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 15,00,000 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from October 15, 2016 to the date of full payment.

1. Basic facts

A. On May 10, 2007, the Plaintiff and Nonparty C were legally married couple who completed the marriage report and had two children between C and C.

B. The Defendant and C were in the same window of an elementary school located in Daegu. Around March 2014, the Defendant served in the U.S. military unit in Korea, at an elementary school alumni meeting held in Daegu, and even after the transfer to the U.S. military unit in the U.S. on July 2014, the Defendant contacted with each other.

C. On April 7, 2015, the Defendant sent e-mail to C to the effect that “the Defendant has loved with the truth, but is well salvable only to the Plaintiff while having been informed of the contact with him.” On the same day, C sent e-mail to the Defendant that “I want to love and report.”

On April 8, 2015, the Defendant sent to C an e-mail to the effect that “If the promotion was made in August 8, 2015, C studies can also be conducted without any problem, and we may live in while travelling well.” The Defendant sent to C the Plaintiff e-mail to the effect that “I am e-mail with the Plaintiff.”

E. Around May 2015, the Defendant met C in the west-ro of the Japanese business trip, and at the time C entered the name of himself and the Defendant in the hotel hotel name group.

F. On September 2015, the Defendant sent a text message to the Plaintiff to the effect that “C is well-grounded and the parents of C are able to look at,” after having met C in Daegu.

G. C sent text messages to the Defendant on December 2, 2015.

H. C removed from office on March 2016, 2016.

I. On June 2016, the Defendant entered the Republic of Korea upon the issuance of the U.S. military unit to the Republic of Korea, and the appearance that the Defendant gets her hand and her knife at Pyeongtaek’s home and her knife at the street was taken.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap1 or 6's entries or videos (including virtual numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The wrongful act of a spouse under Article 840 subparagraph 1 of the Civil Code, which judged the cause of the claim, is a broad concept, including the adultery, to the simple passage.