logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2019.09.20 2019고단1982
상습특수폭행등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant: (a) B B from June 18, 2013 to January 10, 2014; (b) from January 30, 2014 to June 19, 2014; (c) from August 12, 2014 to November 15, 2014, the Defendant was on board D as a class engineer; (d) from August 20, 2016 to November 27, 2017, the Defendant was on board as the first class engineer in E; (e) from around April 20, 2016 to around January 20, 2017; (e) from around June 30, 2014 to around June 30, 2014 to around June 19, 2014; (e) the victim F (22); (e) the victim was on board B; and (e) the victim was on board the victim’s age B; and (e) the victim was the victim 3 B1;

1. On May 2014, the Defendant habitually abused victims over 32 times in total from June 2013 to October 2016, on the ground that the victim was unable to know his/her own horse properly and the victim was found in his/her hot water in the power generator room in operation of a place where it is difficult to identify the police officer’s name during the period of May 2014.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually assaulted victims by carrying dangerous articles.

2. The Defendant forced the victims to board a ship for a certain period of time and undergo the practical training course, and normally graduated from the above university. The Defendant worked with the senior engineer or senior mate during the practical training period. The details of the evaluation of the practical training are notified to the Maritime Shipping Company to which the victims were enrolled, and the contents of the evaluation of the practical training including the “pre-employment opinion” are also notified to the Maritime Shipping Company to which the pertinent ship belongs. Thus, the victims were enrolled in the course of the practical training or receiving a lower score from the evaluation of the practical training. Thus, the Defendant’s graduation from the university and military service.

arrow