A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

The defendant shall be liable to the applicant for damages caused by the damage to property.

Punishment of the crime

On November 30, 2017, at the Jinan public parking lot located in 110-4, Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers regarding the prevention, suppression, etc. of crimes, and at the same time, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the security room for 14 days to the victim, and damaged the property owned by the victim by 20,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A E-document;

1. An investigation report (Submission of a written estimate for safeness that has been destroyed);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing injury diagnostic certificates, damaged photographs, motion pictures taken on-site CDs;

1. Article 257 (1), Article 136 (1), and Article 366 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (the punishment between the crime of injury and the crime of obstructing the performance of official duties, and the punishment prescribed for the crime of serious injury shall be imposed);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 31(1) and (3), and 32(1)3 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Compensation Orders and Partial Dismissal Lawsuit (in the case of claiming medical expenses and consolation money due to an injury, it is recognized that it is not reasonable to make an order for compensation due to insufficient data to specify the amount of compensation) of the police officer’s reasons for sentencing, above E in front of the police officer’s explanation, and in the case of E, the police officer’s intentional price the face of the police officer.