All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in this case’s sentencing conditions, the lower court’s sentence against the Defendants (Defendant A: 10 months of imprisonment and Defendant B: 6 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case was committed on August 29, 2008 by mixing the production year with other rice and distributing them with the consumer's trust in the processing and distribution of agricultural products and causing fears to consumers as to the quality of agricultural products and product safety. The amount of Defendant A falsely indicated and distributed the production year reaches 1,380 tons, and Defendant B falsely indicated 410 tons of the production year and 410 tons of the total amount of punishment, including the previous criminal records, the Defendants issued several penalties, and in particular, on August 29, 2008, Defendant A was sentenced to 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor, and Defendant A issued a summary order to 00 won of the total amount of fine on July 22, 201, and Defendant A issued a false summary order to 200 won of the total amount of fine, and Defendant A also stated that “The date of suspension of indictment is likely to mislead the general rice without rice,” and Defendant A received a false summary order on July 22, 2011.”