logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.09.18 2019고정1041
한국마사회법위반(도박개장등)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 7,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No person, other than a defendant A-ma society, shall engage in any activity similar to a riding vote, in connection with a racing conducted by a marina society, in paying property or financial benefits to the enemy;

The Defendant, while staying at the off-of-the-counter market outlet in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, intended to purchase a private horse ticket from many unspecified persons who want to purchase a private horse ticket, sold a private horse ticket, sold the horse horse ticket, and then marked the horse horse horse horse riding after the racing was finished, he was willing to perform an act of horse racing by paying dividends according to the dividend rate and refunding 20% of the purchase price of horse tickets even if the horse horse was not covered, and on March 17, 2018, sold the horse horse ticket after receiving the betting amount of KRW 80,000 or KRW 20,000 per person of the horse racing conducted by the Korean Racing Association from the Korea Racing Association.

As a result, the defendant caused the act similar to the horse racing voting to be conducted by the Korean Racing Association, thereby paying property and property benefits to the enemy.

2. Defendant B, while being aware of the circumstances that A, with the date and time specified in paragraph (1), and at the place specified in paragraph (1), had the purchaser of the right of horse racing, take an act similar to the horse racing voting conducted by the Korean Racing Association, such as walking a horse ticket purchase slip from F, G, H, I, and J, which is a purchaser of the right of horse horse tickets, and delivering it to A, thereby aiding and abetting Defendant B, by facilitating the act of paying goods or property benefits to the enemy.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of each statute on the suspect examination of police officers against F, H, J, G, A, I, E, or B;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow