A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 26, 2018, the Defendant: (a) at the Busan Northern-gu B, 206 Dong 15, Busan Northern-do, 206 Dong 112 on the 15th floor; (b) asked the Defendant about the circumstances of the instant case; and (c) the police box guard of the Busan Northern Police Station C, who called the Defendant at the scene after receiving a report on the 112 report; and (d) did not see the circumstances of the instant case, the Defendant: (a) took a bath to the Defendant, stating that “I mara, Haki, Haki................”; (b) took a warning by taking the floor of the Defendant who was given a warning, “I spawd, spawd, spawd, spawd, spawd, spawd;” (c) took the Defendant’s desire to do so.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers related to 112 handling of reports.

2. The Defendant, at the same time, at the same place as above, and at the same time and place, and on the slope E (the age of 29) called together with D, having three neighbors, whether the Defendant “I Y, Chewing, I son, I son, I son, I son, I son,” among three neighbors;

Chewing years, North Korean Paris year, and Chewing and Chewing shall be discarded to the end of the year.

“To take a bath over several occasions.”

Accordingly, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F, D, or E;

1. Complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Article 136(1) and Article 311 of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., circumstances favorable to the following grounds for sentencing)

1. The scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines of this case interference with the execution of official duties of this case constitutes the mitigated area (one month to August) among the types 1 of interference with the execution of official duties (Interference with the performance of official duties and coercion of duties).

- Special mitigated persons: The offense of insult in this case is the sentencing criteria if the degree of assault, intimidation, deceptive scheme, or obstruction of official duties is minor.