logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1983. 5. 10. 선고 83도632 판결
[교통사고처리특례법위반·도로교통법위반][집31(3)형,34;공1983.7.1.(707),995]
Main Issues

Appellate Body of the defendant against the judgment dismissing public prosecution

Summary of Judgment

When a judgment dismissing a public prosecution is rendered, the defendant returns to the state without filing a public prosecution and is relieved from the risk of conviction, so the judgment cannot be deemed disadvantageous to the defendant, so the defendant has no right to appeal against a judgment dismissing a public prosecution.

[Reference Provisions]

Articles 327 and 338 of the Criminal Procedure Act

Escopics

Defendant

upper and high-ranking persons

Defendant

Defense Counsel

Attorney Bo Dong-young

Judgment of the lower court

Daegu District Court Decision 82No1531 delivered on February 11, 1983

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The essence of an appeal for the defendant is to request a judgment disadvantageous to the defendant by correcting a disadvantageous judgment against him/her, so the defendant cannot have the right to appeal against it unless the judgment is disadvantageous to him/her. When there is a judgment dismissing a public prosecution, the defendant is reinstated to the state where no prosecution was instituted, and thus, the judgment cannot be deemed disadvantageous to the defendant.

Therefore, the defendant does not have the right to appeal against the judgment dismissing the public prosecution. Therefore, the defendant's objection against the judgment dismissing the public prosecution by the court below is unlawful, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Jeong Tae-tae (Presiding Justice)

arrow
심급 사건
-대구지방법원 1983.2.11선고 82노1531