logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2015. 02. 12. 선고 2014두44380 판결
(심리불속행) 임대용부동산을 자기자본으로 취득 후 이를 담보로 대출받아 자본을 회수하면, 지급이자는 필요경비에 해당됨[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2014Nu52123 ( October 15, 2014)

Case Number of the previous trial

Seocho 2013west 0874 (27 May 2013)

Title

(A) If a real estate for real estate was acquired as a equity capital and borrowed as a collateral and the capital is recovered, the interest paid falls under necessary expenses.

Summary

(The main point of the judgment) If a person who acquired real estate for rent by himself/herself as a collateral obtains a loan from him/her and collects invested capital, this result in holding real estate for rent as capital of another person, and thus, the loan itself is deemed to have been used to obtain gross income, and the interest paid thereon constitutes necessary expenses.

Related statutes

Article 27 of the Income Tax Act

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

The judgment of the court below and the appellate brief all of the records of this case, but the appellant's ground of appeal is not included in the grounds provided in each subparagraph of Article 4 (1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow