The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. The Defendant is a person who operates a supermarket with the trade name of “E” located in Gangnam-si C.

No one shall sell drugs, etc. harmful to juveniles to juveniles.

Nevertheless, around 08:42 on March 20, 2018, the Defendant received 4,500 won from the juvenile F (15 years of age, female) and sold tobacco 1 of Lebin.

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by this court, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone, which the Defendant intended to sell tobacco to the juvenile F, was intentional.

The recognition is insufficient, and there is no other evidence to prove it.

① G (21) “A” between F and A, i.e., “A., A,” was purchased from the Defendant in the instant Schlage to the Defendant.

② G’s opening of the packaging of tobacco, known that “I”, rather than “Irrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrt brrrrt,” which was intended to purchase tobacco at the beginning, was sought to exchange to the Defendant. However, the Defendant’s “Irrrrrrrrrrrrt brrrt brrrt brrrrt

③ The above supermarkets were in existence.

F entered the Smarket and arbitration of the dispute between the Defendant and G, and the Defendant paid money to the Defendant for a new change in Category 1 A, and the Defendant received Category 1 A as the Defendant.

④ At the time, F had been using a scambling scambling on the color scambling.

⑤ After that, F reported to the police that the Defendant did not exchange tobacco.

6. From the defendant's standpoint, a person who purchased the original tobacco was G and refused a request from G to exchange tobacco, thereby purchasing new tobacco at the same place as G. As such, a person who intends to receive tobacco by actually purchasing tobacco is not F, but G.