A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) is a person engaging in driving a motor vehicle B.

On July 8, 2018, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol 0.187% of the blood alcohol concentration on July 8, 2018, driven the said Abandoned Vehicle with the same alcohol content 0.187%, was driving along the two-lane road in front of the Dvalescent Hospital C in Jeju, along the two-lane way from the north to the south.

In such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately operating the brake system and controlling speed by checking the front side in a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and did not look at the front door while under the influence of alcohol and went through as it is without examining the front door, and took part of the front part of the FRason car driven by the injured party E (the age of 51) with the front part of the FRason car operated by the injured party E (the age of 51), and due to its shock, the front part of the said LRason car was the back part of the HHasonson car driven by the injured party G (the age of 31).

Ultimately, the Defendant driven the said car in a situation where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of alcohol, and suffered injury such as the victim E, the victim I (the 50 years old), the passenger of the said car, and the victim J (the 22 years old), who are in need of medical treatment for about two weeks, such as the dysium and tension in the dysium of the dysium, and the dysium and tension in the dysium in need of medical treatment for about two weeks to the victim G.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) driving a vehicle B while under the influence of alcohol of about 0.187% from the section of approximately 1.5 km to the road indicated in paragraph (1) on the “Lcafeteria” road near the viewing store located in K at the time of making a temporary warning as stated in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;