A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On September 17, 2009, the Defendant was issued a summary order of 700,000 won of a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Central District Court, and on March 19, 2014, sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul East East District Court for the same crime.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around 21:00 on April 21, 2020, the Defendant violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act by driving eFst or other vehicles from the front of the D cafeteria in the vicinity of the C Institution located in the Jeju City to the road adjacent to C Institution’s Cheongmun, while under the influence of alcohol at least 0.187%.

2. On April 21, 2020, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) and the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) were able to dym the horses under the influence of alcohol level of 0.187%. On April 21, 2020, the Defendant driven eF Last or other vehicles under the influence of alcohol such as drinking, while driving eFst or other vehicles under the influence of alcohol, and proceeded 2 km one way ahead of the c institution in Jeju CityF at the seat of the Gu tax office at a speed of about 20km

At all times, a road was installed with signal apparatus to prevent a direct decline, and at the front of the road, a vehicle from a G driving HH was stopped, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle in the front of the road in order to reduce the speed in advance to those engaged in the driving of the vehicle, to properly operate the steering wheel and operation of the steering system, and to prevent any collision with the vehicle in the front of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive a car at a normal time due to influence of alcohol and neglected to do so while driving the said car, thereby treating the victim G (the age of 57) for about two weeks, due to the negligence in the course of performing duties, of driving the said car at the top of the steering force of the said EFrocketing and other car.