A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 21, 2012, the Defendant and D conspiredd with the Defendant on March 21, 2012, 2012, stating that “W.naver.com sell the phase 2(s) of the Internet NAV (www.naver) on the bulletin board of the E site of the Internet NAV (www.naver.com).” On the part of the victim F, who reported the above posted article, “I wish to send the amount of goods from which the goods are deposited to a door-to-door.”

However, the defendant and D did not have the above decentralization at the time, and merely puts false sales letters due to lack of living expenses, and thus did not have the intent or ability to sell the goods to the victim according to the above agreement.

As a result, the Defendant and D conspired, as seen above, received KRW 120,000 from the victims in total 15 times in the same manner as shown in the annexed crime list 1 between April 10, 2012, including that the Defendant and D, by deceiving the victims as above, and received KRW 2,203,00 from the victims as the price for goods from the national bank account in the name of the above temporary G.

"2012 Highest 6786" Defendant posted a false letter to sell goods by accessing the Internet site's "Nber E Caf," and thought to use goods by acquiring the prices from those who reported it and take contact.

On December 7, 2011, the Defendant posted a letter to the effect that “after having access to the above site by a computer at the motherel where it is impossible to know the trade name located in the Busan-gu Busan-dong, Busan-do, the Defendant sold an Ampid 2” on the bulletin board.

However, as above, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to sell the Ampid 2.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim C who was able to believe and communicate with the above false sales notice, received 650,000 won from the victim to the account of community credit cooperatives under H’s name, and received the same.