[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

[Defendant B] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

On February 4, 2016, 2016, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months at the Busan District Court for embezzlement, and the above judgment was finalized on the 12th of the same month on the 10th of the same month.

[Criminal facts]

1. On February 24, 2012, the Defendant changed official document: (a) issued the details of the perusal by the moving household to the transfer household to the transfer household to the loan that does not have the actual moving household from the Busan Suwon-gu Down-gu; (b) attached “203A” to the number column of the inspection details of the moving household that was issued; and (c) copied them; and (d) recorded the details of the moving household’s perusal as if the moving household did not have the above lending household’s moving household under 203A; and (d) stated the above loan’s “202A”, “203B”, and “203C” as above.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of uttering, has changed the four chapters of the perusal of the transferred household under the name of the head of Dong Dong Dong Dong-gu, Busan Metropolitan City E, which is an official document.

2. On the same day, the Defendant submitted a modified official document to the staff in charge of the loan of the above new cooperation, as if he had duly formed four copies of the perusal of the transferred household, which is a modified official document, as described in paragraph 1, in G New Cooperatives located in the Busan Young-gu.

3. Fraud;

A. The Defendant did not have a lessee, i.e., a household that transferred to the Defendant, at the time, place, and place described in paragraph 2, the victim G’s new consultation loan to the employees in charge of the victim G’s new consultation.

“.” The loan agreement also stated the same content and presented four copies of the perusal of the transferred household altered as described in paragraph (2).

However, in fact, there was a tenant in the above loan No. 203A, 203B, 203C, which is the object of security, and the details of the transfer household inspection submitted at the time of the loan application were modified as stated in paragraph 1.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 194,00,000 won from the victim on the same day.

B. The Defendant, on August 8, 2012, is a victim of Gindo located in the Busan Young-gu F, Busan.