beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of ten months, and Defendant C and D shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal record] On March 11, 2015, Defendant A was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor and two years of suspension of execution for fraud, etc. at the District Court of Jung-gu District on October 29, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 29, 2015. On May 25, 2016, Defendant A was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for alteration of official documents at the same court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 29, 2016.
[Criminal facts]
1. Fraud by Defendant A (2016 highest 4287);
A. The Defendant, the Defendant, the Defendant of the case of the Oral Capital Loan Co., Ltd., committed an alteration of the content of the perusal of the moving-in household, which is an official document, as the former lessee did not exist in the Namyang-si, which is registered under the name of the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as “I apartment”) at the Nam-si, the Namyang-si, where the name of the Defendant was registered, to provide the apartment as security and to obtain the loan by obtaining the delivery.
(1) On August 9, 2013, the Defendant: (a) deleted the “J, K, and the householder’s “L” on the bottom of the address A’s address, at a place not known through a brode of the nameless loan brode (a) around August 9, 2013; and (b) drafted one copy of the statement of inspection by the transferred household as of August 9, 2013, as the date of issuance, as L was not listed as a lessee.
Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the defendant changed one copy of the statement of inspection of the transferred household, which is an official document, in the name of the head of Namyang-si, Namyang-si.
(B) On August 9, 2013, the Defendant borrowed money from the Defendant’s office No. 213 of the Gangnam-gu Seoul NN building No. 213, and exercised it by delivering one copy of the perusal statement of the transferred household altered as above to the employees in charge of lending the victim company as if it was genuine.
(2) The Defendant is an employee in charge of lending funds to the victim company, as the date, time, place, and place described in subparagraph (1)-B, and as if he did not have senior tenants on I apartment.