logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2015.04.30 2015고단412
사전자기록등위작등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant was under the influence of alcohol by 0.179% without obtaining a driver’s license for a vehicle, while driving a vehicle with a volume of KRW 100 meters from January 17, 2015 to the road located in Daegu-gu B, Daegu-gu, about 01:05 to the road located in the same Cmatet in the same manner.

2. On January 17, 2015, the Defendant was found to have driven alcohol in front of the Cart in Daegu-gu, Seogu, Daegu-gu, at around 01:05 on January 17, 2015, and performed a drinking measurement by moving to the merchant zone located in the same Dong on January 17, 2015, and was punished by the police officer for questioning of his personal information, and the remaining parts of the electronic records, as if they were the “E” in which he was his own seat, were known.

After that, the Defendant: (a) requested the police officer to sign a notice of the result of the drinking driving control indicating the details of the “E” through a police portable information device (PDA); (b) for the purpose of handling the affairs, signed a sign as if he was an “E” on the right side signature column stated in the above notice; (c) forged the driver signature column of the notice of the results of the drinking driving control, which is a prior record of the certification of facts connected to the traffic police network, which is a prior record of the certificate of facts connected to the traffic police network; and (d) subsequently, the Defendant used the written prior record by allowing the driver to transmit the signature column of the notice of the results of the driving control to the traffic police network.

3. Around January 17, 2015, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) was asked by a police officer about personal information at the said merchant district; (b) was using the “F” resident registration number of E, a person who is the seat of his/her memory, as described in the foregoing paragraph 2; and (c) arbitrarily downloaded the “F” to use another person’s resident registration number.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.

arrow