logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.02.11 2013고단5510
변호사법위반등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was sentenced on December 29, 2009 to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) at the Jung-gu District Court on October 21, 2010 and completed the execution of the sentence on October 21, 2010 while a representative attorney-at-law of "law firm F" operated the said corporation as a representative attorney-at-law, and the registration of a lawyer was revoked on September 1, 2010.

Defendant

B is a non-registration office of law firm G.

1. Defendant A

A. From March 2011 to June 201, the Defendant operated a law office, such as: (a) the trade name of “law firm I” on the fourth floor of the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu H building; (b) the trade name of “law firm G” from June 201 to October 31, 201; and (c) ten employees, including the J-at-law and office employees, at the aforementioned place from June 201 to October 31, 201; and (d) the said law office conducted a lawsuit on the ground delegated by the clan.

Accordingly, even though the defendant is not a lawyer, he employed a lawyer and operated a law office.

B. On July 21, 2011, the Defendant, at the above law firm G office, received a request from the K clan representative L to provide legal counseling on the lawsuit, agreed to receive 30% of the winning amount as a fee for the fees. On October 20, 201, the Defendant filed a lawsuit claiming the transfer of ownership (201, 10945) with the J attorney-at-law employed by the Defendant, and filed a lawsuit claiming the transfer of ownership (201, 10945) with the U.S. District Court in order to have the attorney-at-law perform the litigation.

Accordingly, the defendant agreed to receive money and valuables from a person who is not an attorney-at-law and dealt with legal affairs such as legal counseling on litigation cases.

2. Although Defendant B is not an attorney-at-law who receives or promises to receive money, valuables, entertainment, or other benefits, the defendant is not allowed to act as an agent for a case, in case where the defendant attracts a lawsuit seeking a clan's "proced land" between law firm G operator A and the defendant.

arrow