- -

Punishment of the crime

No person, other than an attorney-at-law, who receives or promises to receive money, valuables, entertainment or other benefits, shall handle legal services, such as appraisal, representation, arbitration, reconciliation, solicitation, legal consultation or preparation of legal documents, with respect to a litigation case, after having received or promised to receive

1. On May 8, 2008, the Defendant was not an attorney-at-law. On May 8, 2008, on the front day of the Gangnam-gu Seoul building, on May 8, 2008, the Defendant introduced D’s F as an attorney with respect to the handling of compensation claim cases filed against the Korea Water Resources Corporation by three persons, including D’s children E, as well as D’s children, to receive remuneration equivalent to 5% of the winning interest, as in the above lawsuit, as in the case of winning the lawsuit, and then, he received KRW 1 million in cash for expenses, and collected evidentiary materials necessary for the lawsuit, such as field photographs, and prepared the draft of the preparatory document.

As a result, the defendant promised to receive money and valuables from a person who is not an attorney-at-law, and prepared legal documents on the next litigation case and handled other legal affairs.

2. On January 11, 2011, the Defendant, who violated the Attorney-at-Law Act, was not an attorney-at-law. On January 11, 2011, the Defendant collected and promised to receive 3% remuneration from D in the appellate court of the case of the claim for compensation payment, which was filed against the Korea Water Resources Corporation, as described in the foregoing paragraph 1, to collect evidence necessary for the lawsuit, such as field photographs, and prepared a draft of the preparatory document while the said appellate court is proceeding.

As a result, the defendant promised to receive money and valuables from a person who is not an attorney-at-law, prepared legal documents on the case and handled other legal affairs.

3. On March 21, 2011, the Defendant, who violated the Attorney-at-Law Act, is not an attorney-at-law, but at the place where around March 15, 201 was not an attorney-at-law.