The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. A favorable circumstance is that the Defendant, who made a judgment, led to the confession of the instant crime and divided his mistake.

However, narcotics-related crimes are not likely to be committed in terms of social harm and risk of recidivism.

However, considering the fact that the Defendant committed each of the narcotics crimes of this case even during the period of repeated crime due to the same crime, the Defendant did not limit the use of phiphones to administered them by himself, and distributed them to others, such as provision, sale, etc., the period of the crime is long and the frequency of the crime is also high, disadvantageous circumstances such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances of the crime, and various other circumstances, which are the conditions of sentencing as shown in pleadings, such as the defendant’s age, character and conduct, circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.