1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B Co., Ltd.: (a) 133,59,027 won and KRW 71,762,938 from October 7, 2019.

1. The grounds for the attachment to the indication of the claim (However, “creditor” and “debtor” are as stated in the separate attachment to the claim(s) and the changed grounds for the claim(s).

2. Grounds: Judgment deemed as confession (Articles 208 (3) 2 and 150 (3) of the Civil Procedure Act);

A. The special representative C of Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) did not submit a reply, etc. with the name of the Defendant Co., Ltd. despite being served with a duplicate, etc. of the complaint, and did not appear on the designated date of pleading even after being notified of lawful date.

Ultimately, the defendant company is deemed to have led to the confession of the plaintiff's assertion of the cause of claim.

(2) Defendant C, Defendant D, and Defendant E argued to the effect that they should repay within the scope of the property inherited from the networkF, inasmuch as they obtained the inheritance limit approval from the written reply of January 16, 2020 on June 23, 2014.

Since then, the plaintiff submitted an application for amendment to the purport of the claim and its cause on April 29, 2020, and subsequently reduced the claims against the above defendants in accordance with the purport of the judgment of limited acceptance by inheritance. The above defendants did not submit a written reply or legal brief to the purport that they legitimately delivered the above application for amendment to the purport of the claim and its cause, and did not appear on the designated date of pleading even after being notified of legitimate date.

Ultimately, the above Defendants are deemed to have led to all confessions on the grounds of the modified claims based on the Plaintiff’s claim of April 29, 2020 and the amended claim of change of grounds.