logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.09.14 2018고단2133
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 9, 2018, at around 05:31, 2018, the Defendant: (a) was demanded by the victim D, who was under influence of alcohol in the “EPC room” where the victim D, who was in interest in Sinh City, was able to sit on the above PC room room, and tried to sit on the above PC room, and tried to do so; and (b) the Defendant was demanded to do so to do so from the victim, that he tried to do so.

Professor Dok,

The PC business of the victim was obstructed for about 10 minutes, such as taking a bath for the victim, continuing to follow the victim, and taking a bath.

2. 공무집행 방해 피고인은 위 제 1 항과 같은 일시 및 장소에서 위 제 1 항과 같이 소란을 피워 112 신고를 받고 출 동한 시흥 경찰서 F 파출소 소속 경장 G으로부터 욕설을 중단할 것을 요구 받자 G에게 “ 니 애 미 애 미년, 씨 발 경찰 좃 밥새끼들이 ”라고 욕설을 하고, 계속해서 위 PC 방 카운터 안으로 들어가려고 하다가 G으로부터 이를 제지 당하자 왼손 주먹으로 G의 오른쪽 어깨를 1회 때려 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of H and D

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under the Criminal Act prevents the victim from performing his/her duties on the grounds that the defendant has become in harmony with the reasons indicated in the judgment, and interferes with the legitimate execution of duties by taking the police officers called upon upon receiving a report as well as the desire for the victim, and by taking the shoulder into consideration the background of the crime, the form of the act, the circumstances after the crime, etc., and thus requires strict punishment.

However, the defendant.

arrow