logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.04.15 2014고단195
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 1, 2014, at around 23:15, the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s business, at an emergency room for the 150 Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Gangdong-gu Hospital, the Defendant interfered with the treatment of the medical professionals of the above hospital, who provides treatment for emergency patients, such as “the director of the hospital, who is in charge of the hospital, from whom he was in charge of him, and who is noise from him,” under the influence of alcohol.

2. In a time and place as referred to in Paragraph 1, when the Defendant listens to six nurses and six medical professionals, and 10 patients with no name, the Defendant publicly insultd the victim D (26) who is the doctor in charge, “I will be in charge of NA, Hashe is not in charge,” and “I will be in charge,” and in governance, I will be in charge, and NA I will be in charge, and NA I will be in NA. I will be in charge of NA, and I will be in NAI. I will be in charge of NA, NAI will be in charge, and NAI will be in charge.”

3. The Defendant, at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph 1, abused the victim on the ground that the victim D himself/herself refrains from doing so, and assaulted the victim by taking his/her hand at one time the left-hand son of the victim.

4. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the same time and place as paragraph (1) of this Article, and the police officer F belonging to the Dongdaemun Police Station E-gu Seoul Police Station, who received and called 112 reports, committed assaulting the Defendant by “doverating” on the ground that F’s face is obstructed, and interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the duty to report and leave.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. Application of the respective laws and regulations of D, F, G and C

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of each fine;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act shall apply to concurrent crimes;

arrow