logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.02.12 2012고단4331
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 18, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 years for fraud in order to imprisonment with prison labor for a period of 8 months in the Jung-gu District Court Goyang branch on March 18, 2010, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 26th of the same month, but the sentence of the suspended sentence was revoked and the execution of the sentence was terminated on October 2, 2012 by the Suwon

Around September 25, 2010, the Defendant, along with B, posted an advertisement stating that he/she sells the Gu-U.S. Integrated Bus Terminal that is located in the Gu-U.S. Pyeong-500D camera at the Internet N.S. V. Central Bus Terminal that is located in the Gu-U.S. P., Si-S., and falsely reported it to the victim C, “I will send the money to home-to-house.”

However, the defendant did not have the above Kamera, and there was no thought that he will send it to the victim on his own.

In collusion with B, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 375,000 won from the victim to the new bank account under B for the name of Kameras, and acquired 2,425,000 won in total on seven occasions from around that time to April 25, 2012, such as the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

[2012 Highest 590] The Defendant posted a false Kamera sales book on D and Internet NAB “China” page, and D conspired to buy money against victims who reported and communicate by means of providing an account to receive remittance of the sales price of goods and a mobile phone.

On May 26, 2011, the Defendant posted a notice to the effect that he/she sold 500D cameras for 7,300,000 won by accessing Internet NAVER to the PC page where the trade name near the performance parking lot located in Yeonsu-gu Incheon, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon is unknown.

However, the facts are that the defendant did not have a 500D camera, so even if he receives the payment from the victim.

arrow