Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On March 29, 2016, the Defendant reported 12 to the effect that “I am under drinking, as I am under drinking, as I am under the influence of drinking, I am under the influence of drinking. I am under the influence of drinking.” On March 29, 2016, the Defendant sent to the above place around 20:45, the Defendant threatened F of the racing and Police Station Emb box belonging to the racing and Police Station Embox, and G am under the influence of the report by I am under the influence of I am under the influence of I am under the influence of I am under the influence of I am under the influence of I am under the influence of I am under the influence of I am under the influence of I am under the influence of I am.
In the face of the inside, the interest rate shall be broken.
In order to see “” and to confirm the circumstances, the facts constituting the crime are modified in accordance with the facts acknowledged in accordance with the witness’s legal statement, where he/she saw the G’s arms frighting to the parking lot, fright to the face of the drinking, and tried to receive F’s neck as his/her head.
Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted G and F, and prevented police officers from performing their legitimate duties in relation to the handling of reported cases.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;
1. An investigation report (a copy of a public official's certificate, attachment of a police box service), an investigation report (Attachment of a picture that the victim's hand threatens), a report on 112 case handling table (case number 1895), and a report processing case list 112 (case number 1905) / Although the defendant and his/her defense counsel have taken a bath for the portion in a restaurant, they are arguing to the effect that there is no fact that the victim police officers have taken a bath for the portion in a restaurant, but they do not want to put the part in drinking or get the part in a bath for his/her head.
In light of the fact that the statement of the victimized police officer corresponds to the details of the 112 reported case processing, etc., and that the victimized police officer made a false statement or made a false statement without any special reason, it is deemed that the statement of the victimized police officer is reliable.
As such, the defendant and his defense counsel's argument is without merit.
Application of Statutes
1..