logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.01.20 2016고단5160
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties on September 14, 2016, within the “C” located in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, Namyang-si, 2016.

“On the ground that the police officer of the Namyang-ju Police Station D, who was dispatched to the site upon receipt of the report of 112, was broken the Defendant who was divingd by the bridge F, such as the bridge F, who was a police box affiliated with the police box of the Namyang-ju Police Station E, and sent the complaint to the bridge, “Ye, f.h. h.,” and then pushed the body of the brue E while carrying the brush, tightly h.h., who was on the face of the brub F, which continued to display the drinking, damaged the brub of the brue F, who was h.h., h. to h., the h.h. h., the h. h., the h., the h.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with police officers' legitimate performance of their official duties on the handling of 112 reported cases.

2. 모욕 피고인은 제 1 항의 일시 및 장소에서, 위 음식점의 종업원과 그 식당 앞을 지나가던 다수의 시민들이 보는 앞에서 피해 자인 경장 E과 경장 F에게 “ 야 이 씨팔놈들 아, 내가 알아서 들어 갈게”, “ 개새끼들 내가 뭘 잘못했냐.

“The victims were publicly insulting.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Each statement of G and H;

1. Complaint;

1. Investigation reports (in-depth CCTV analysis cases) and investigation reports (in-depth report on the confirmation of the status of the case);

1. Application of the statutes governing damaged parts of photographs, on-site CCTV CDs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties) of the same Act;

1. Where an act of assault or intimidation is committed against multiple public officials who perform the same duties as commercial concurrence, the act of assault or intimidation is established according to the number of public officials who perform the official duties. The above act of assault or intimidation was committed in the same opportunity at the same place, and is assessed as one act in light of social norms.

arrow