logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2012. 02. 22. 선고 2011누34407 판결
형사사건으로 인한 구속은 가산세 감면의 정당한 사유라고 할 수 없음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul Administrative Court 201Gudan829 ( October 26, 2011)

Case Number of the previous trial

National Tax Service Review and Transfer 2010-0345 (Law No. 10, 2011)

Title

Detention due to a criminal case may not be deemed a justifiable reason for the reduction of penalty tax.

Summary

In light of the fact that there is time to file a preliminary return of capital gains tax before being detained in a criminal case (as in the judgment of the first instance court), and that it is impossible to file a return through an agent even after being detained, the circumstance of detention cannot be deemed justifiable grounds for nonperformance of a return.

Related statutes

Article 6 of the Framework Act on National Taxes

Article 2 of the Enforcement Decree of Framework Act on National Taxes

Cases

2011Nu34407. Revocation of disposition of imposing transfer tax due to bad faith in filing a transfer tax return and additional tax for unfaithful payment

Plaintiff

KimA

Defendant

Head of Yeongdeungpo Tax Office

Conclusion of Pleadings

December 21, 2011

Imposition of Judgment

February 22, 2012

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are incidental to the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance court is revoked. The disposition of imposition of KRW 1,510,581 and additional tax for unfaithful payment shall be revoked, among the disposition of imposition of KRW 9,967,573 on July 5, 2010 against the Plaintiff on July 5, 201, which was rendered by the Defendant to the Plaintiff on July 5, 208.

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of this court is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 11420 of the Civil Procedure Act. Since the judgment of the court of first instance

arrow