A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 24, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 04:16, around the day of the performance of official duties, sent a plaque to the above hotel staff D and non-foreigners; and (b) the police officer F and G, a police officer belonging to the Busan East Police Station E Zone B, who were the police officer belonging to the Busan East Police Station E Zone B, arrived at the scene of the patrol vehicle after receiving 112 reports.

The Defendant discovered the patrol vehicle dispatched to the site, laid the upper end of the patrol vehicle by hand, laid off the patrol vehicle at the patrol vehicle, laid off the said F, G with drinking in several times, and obstructed legitimate performance of duties in relation to the patrol duty of the F and G, by speaking to the large sound of “Woos such as human waste, Chewing flag, and knife in the knife.”

2. At the time and place set forth in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant insultd the victim publicly by publicly speaking the victim’s background F and G as “the victim reported, the victim’s f including D, and the victim’s f and G with the large sound “the victim reported,” such as garbage, flue, private stick, and Chewing.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F and D;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [the sentencing criteria] (the scope of recommendations made in accordance with the sentencing guidelines] and the basic area of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the obstruction of performance of official duties/performance of official duties) (6 months to one year and four months) and the offense of insult that are concurrent with the offense of obstruction of official duties is not set. As such, the sentencing guidelines are

[Decision of sentence] There is no person who is a special person [decision of sentence] defendant commits a crime.