logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.10.27 2016고단3380
무고
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. Around August 22, 2016, the Defendant received a written complaint from the public service center of the broad-name police station in the digital digital digital area of 5, the summary of the facts charged, stating that “The Defendant was subject to assault by taking two kinds of E and destroying the body of the complainant in around August 10, 2016, by taking care of and taking a bath for the complainant’s body at around August 10, 2016.” On the same day, the Defendant stated in the public service center of the broad-name police station in the G-name police station and the office of the Criminal 3 Team office that “The Defendant was subject to assault by taking two kinds of E and destroying the shoulder.”

However, in fact, in around August 10, 2016, E did not inflict any injury upon the Defendant in the course of taking or taking the steps of the Defendant in the F Industrial Complex.

Accordingly, the defendant filed a false complaint against E for the purpose of having the criminal punishment imposed upon E, and made a false accusation against E.

2. According to the records, the evidence presented by the prosecutor alone, which is recognized as follows, sufficiently proven that the facts charged in the instant case constitute a reasonable doubt.

It is difficult to see, and there is no other sufficient evidence.

① The Defendant consistently asserts to the effect that he/she was subject to assault, such as taking out, etc. from E on August 10, 2016. The Defendant consistently argued that he/she was in charge of an emergency medical service activity of the Bupyeong Fire Station “the Defendant was in charge of having taken the left side of the factory-related person.”

In addition, it may be open to any extent other than the current left side.

In the 112 Report Processing Statement, the “on-site termination after consultation is given to the factory site at the time of filing a complaint regarding the part of the assault” is also indicated in the 112 Report Report, and the 112 Report is also indicated in the 10th Report on Injury (in the case of the main injury disease), which is also indicated in the (in the case of the main injury disease), such as damage, outbreak, fall, and fall on both sides, and the degree

In light of these circumstances, the statement that the defendant was assaulted by E from the beginning is consistent, and it is difficult to dismiss the credibility of the defendant's statement easily.

2. E, G, and H may be conducted in this Court.

arrow