The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant, like the facts charged, has the injured person faced with electric wheelchairs.

2. Determination

A. In the lower court, the Defendant also argued to the effect similar to the grounds for appeal, and the lower court held that the statement made by the victim’s investigative agency to the victim’s investigation agency on the background during which the instant injury was inflicted does not coincide with the statement made by this court. However, the victim, at the time of the preparation of the written statement, following the victim’s statement, “I would like to make the victim’s right edge with the front wheelchairs, and I would like to have “I would like to make the Defendant’s statement” with the front wheelchairs, “I would like to write down the right edge of the lower wheel with the front wheels at the time of the preparation of the police statement

The phrase, on the one hand, "on the other, wheel chairsed with the right edges of low, etc.

It is the same that in the case of a wheeling of one word "," the wheel part of the wheels facing the right edges of the lower.

“Along with the statement made by the court of the court below, the witness’s appearance in the court of the court below is consistent with the statement that “the front wheelchairs of the defendant was going beyond the witness’s body,” and the victim visited the E member on the day of the instant case and received medical treatment. The victim’s name in the diagnosis letter of the doctor’s appearance of the above hospital is indicated as “abstine damage on the bridge’s surface under the knenee knee’s knee, knee’s knee’s knee’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s kne’s knife’s knife’s knife’s knife’s knife’s knife’s knife’s knife’s knife’s knife’s knife’s k’s.”

As above, it is reasonable to view it.