logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.11.06 2014고단2560
결혼중개업의관리에관한법률위반
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates an international marriage broker with the trade name "D" in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Officetel 305.

1. No marriage broker engaged in labeling or advertising with false or exaggerated contents shall place any false or exaggerated indication or advertisement;

Nevertheless, on August 21, 2013, the Defendant, despite the fact that the said branch office was operated in Vietnam or obtained permission related to international marriage, and that there was no contract with the company that obtained permission related to international marriage from Vietnam, posted a false representation on the bulletin board of the above company’s Internet camera (F) in the Defendant’s residence located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul, for the purpose of “D”, the head of the local branch office is operating in Vietnam and directly managing the local administration and the new affairs. The company directly employs local employees in Vietnam and directly employs local employees in Vietnam and manages the employees, and the company manages the employees in Vietnam is extremely rare, i.e., the company is extremely rare, i., the company operating the off-site system, and the local branch office directly operates the office, i.e., the head of the local branch office.

2. An international marriage broker who has not provided personal information shall obtain personal information, such as marriage history and health conditions, from a user who has entered into a marriage brokerage contract and from the other party to marriage brokerage, respectively, and shall provide the other party and the user with such personal information in writing;

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인은 2013. 7. 3. 경기 안양시 인근에 있는 카페에서 G와 결혼중개 계약을 체결하고, 2013. 9. 17.경 베트남 하이퐁시에 있는 H 호텔 식당 등에서 G와 베트남 여성 I의 맞선을 진행하여 이들간의 혼인이 성사되었음에도 불구하고, 맞선 이전에 G에게 베트남 공증인의 인증을 받은 위 여성의 신상정보를 서면으로 제공하지 않았다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the defendant;

arrow