logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2012.12.20 2012고정1233
업무방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a member of the company in the Northern-gu, Ulsan-si, and the victim D (the age of 51, the remaining) was affiliated with the E branch and operated a restaurant during the festival period by creating a tent in outdoor for promotion and sale of the friendship in the F festivals Chapter supervised by the North-gu Office in Ulsan-si, Ulsan-si.

At around 12:50 on May 12, 2012, the Defendant again provided a good faith with G related persons in de facto marriage at the Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-si, Ulsan-si, a F festival place, and with G people in de facto marriage at a restaurant at the Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do.

그런데도 육회가 맛이 없다면서 육회 고기를 불판에 얹어 구워 먹는데 불판의 불이 약해지는 것에 기분이 나빠진 위 G이 “이렇게 장사를 할려면 안해야지”라며 불평을 하자 피해자가 “이런데서 불 피운다고 사람 좃 같이 보이나, 씨발년아”라고 욕설을 하였다.

As a result, the Defendant, “sprinks, sprinks, sprinks, sprinks, and sprinks,” and laid the sprinks and sprinks on the floor, and took a serious bath to the victim in the presence of 60 other customers.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's Korean-style publicity and sales business by force over about 10 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D, H and I;

1. Statement of each prosecutorial statement concerning D, H and I;

1. Application of each statute on police statements made to D and H;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserts that the illegality of the victim's act constitutes legitimate self-defense or legitimate act as an act of insulting the defendant's wife by insulting the defendant's wife, and thus, the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the defendant's and defense counsel's assertion of provisional payment order.

According to the macroscopic evidences, the victim is the defendant.

arrow