beta
Text
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the above judgment shall be publicly notified.
Reasons
Ⅰ Summary of the facts charged
1. The Defendant is an insurance solicitor of the Korean War from around 2002 to around 2008, and a person who served as an insurance solicitor of the teaching life from around 2009 to around 2012, and D, the complainant, is a woman whose age and actual age are more than six years old, based on resident registration, is a woman who has graduated from an elementary school.
From February 23, 2005 to December 16, 2005, the Defendant has been close to the complainants by purchasing seven insurance products with the complainants as the insured two children F, etc.
Second, the complainants had physical disability of class 2 in normal invertebrate, and the complainants had been aware of how the F could maintain their livelihood after the death of husband G more than the complainants and the complainants. The Defendant, who was well aware of this, had been paying to the complainants on June 1, 2010, with the premium of KRW 300,000 in one month, may receive KRW 1 billion with the accident insurance proceeds, considering that the traffic accident occurred to the second children if the premium of KRW 300,000 in one month is paid, the complainants are entitled to receive KRW 1 billion with the accident insurance proceeds. Second, whether the two children will not be able to drink with the insurance proceeds. On the other hand, whether or not they belong to the family members, and caused the complainants to subscribe to each of the above insurance policies (hereinafter referred to as "each of the above insurance policies") on or around July 1, 2010 and August 3, 2010.
However, the second half of the complainant reported disability to the Dong Office around October 2010 with the awareness of the above circumstances, and the previous years, the defendant knew that the complainant "if the complainant reported a variable insurance accident, the insurance money would be out of the complainant. It would be difficult to see whether the insured would be different."
2. Cash defraudation;
A. In November 2010, the Defendant stated that “Second, I would like to go to the complainant.”