The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (fact-finding) ① The defendant did not clearly indicate that he/she should take lessons through the Internet or that he/she was a golf junior college located in the AMFN SIVIVITY (hereinafter “the University of this case”) in the Ameras, the U.S. which the defendant presented to F. F. The defendant did not inform the complainant of the situation of the above University through additional investigations, etc., knowing that he/she did not know about the situation of the complainant. ② The defendant was the president of the U.S. LA’s U.S. university, and the defendant could transfer credits if he/she attends the university two years, and the defendant could not be deemed to have obtained a permit from the university of this case to transfer his/her membership or consideration, in light of the fact that he/she could not be deemed to have obtained a permit from the complainant of this case, and the defendant could not be deemed to have received a permit from the university of this case.

Nevertheless, in the first instance judgment that acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged of this case, the lower court erred by misunderstanding facts and adversely affecting the judgment.

2. Determination:

A. The first instance court’s judgment recognized the facts and circumstances as indicated in its reasoning based on the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the Defendant, and, in full view of such circumstances, the Defendant is located in the United States as agreed upon with the complainant.