The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is consistent statement of the victim and evidence submitted by the prosecutor, and the defendant can be found to have acquired money by deceiving the victim, but the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant of the facts charged of this case is erroneous in the misunderstanding of facts.

2. Determination:

A. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant is an insurance solicitor for life from around 2002 to 2008; (b) from around 2009 to around 2012; (c) the complainant is a woman of an elementary school graduate from which the E or actual age is 6 years old on the resident registration. The Defendant has been close to the complainant by having the complainant purchase seven insurance products with the second largest F, etc. from February 23, 2005 to December 16, 2005; (d) whether the complainant would be 100 million won or less for each of these insurance proceeds to whom 10 million won would have been 1 billion won or less for whom 20 million won would have been paid.

Korea has joined this chapter.

However, the second son F reported disability to the Dong Office around October 2010 with the awareness of the above circumstances.