1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around August 14, 2016, Defendant A’s property damage: around 19:35, the Defendant: (a) stopped the vehicle at the front of the Seoul Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government FF distance; (b) demanded the Plaintiff to board the H taxi owned by the Plaintiff Hyundai Traffic (owner); (c) but (d) rejected the said G on the ground that the Plaintiff could not board the taxi due to Gyeonggi taxi; (b) caused the Plaintiff to go off the taxi by getting the knife the part of the knife; and (c) caused the Defendant to go off the taxi by getting the knife the part of the knife, which is the market value of the

2. On August 14, 2016, Defendant B’s obstruction of the performance of official duties: (a) around 19:40, Defendant B committed assault, such as: (b) Defendant B’s refusal of performance of official duties, at the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1) on August 14, 2016; (c) Defendant J of the Seoul Geumcheon Police Station I district united by the Seoul Geumcheon Police Station I, and Defendant B, who was on his/her own, and Defendant B, who was the police of the police of the police of the police of the police of the police of the police of the police of the police of the police of the police of the police of the police of the police of the police of the police of the police of the police of the defendant B, Defendant B, who was sent to the police of the police of the police of the police of the police of the police of the police of the police of the police of

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officials in relation to 112 reported handling affairs.

3. On August 14, 2016, Defendant A’s obstruction of the performance of official duties: (a) arrested Defendant B, as stated in the above paragraph (2), as the police officer J and the police officer of the Seoul Geumcheon Police Station I Zone B, who was a flagrant offender, as he was suspected of having been engaged in the performance of official duties, at the place indicated in the above paragraph (1) at the time of August 14, 2016; and (b) assault Defendant B, who was aboard the patrol vehicle, at the location of the Seoul Geumcheon Police Station I Zone B, as described in the foregoing paragraph (2).

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Defendant B’s partial statement

1. Statement of each police statement to K and J;

1. G statements;

1. On-site reports;

1. Investigation report (the attachment of a photograph of damage and motion picture);

1. Miscellaneouss and photographs; and