logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.01.30 2014노3803
상해
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the fact-finding) lies in the fact that the victim took a bath to the defendant, and the defendant also took a bath to the victim, but did not assault the victim, and rather was assaulted by the victim.

2. The judgment of the court below is consistent with the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, i.e., ① the victim made a statement from the investigative agency to the court of the court of the court below consistent with the following circumstances: (i) the victim made a mistake from the investigation agency to the court of the court of the court of the court below; (ii) the victim made a statement that he was plouted, plouted, and plouted by the victim's finger hand by drinking on August 28, 2013; (iii) the victim corresponds to the victim's statement by receiving a diagnosis of 1 knifbs in need of treatment on August 29, 2013, which is the following day of the instant case; and (iii) D also made a statement that the defendant made a plout and plouting of the victim's hand and finger, as the facts charged, it is recognized that the defendant inflicted an injury on the victim.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow