The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant alleged a mistake of fact when he led the victim to a dancing, and the victim's hand, etc. was killed in the automobile key in the course of blocking the Defendant's hand, and the Defendant did not intentionally bear the victim's hand, etc. as a key to the vehicle, and did not pluck or pluck up the victim's hand, but did not intentionally have the victim's hand, etc. as a key to the vehicle. The lower court erred by misapprehending the fact that the Defendant intentionally sealed the victim's hand, etc. three times as a key to the vehicle, and caused the victim's hand, and caused the victim's hand, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. In light of the legal principles, even if the Defendant: (a) sealed the victim’s hand, etc. as the key to the vehicle; and (b) plucked or plucked the hand hand, this constitutes self-defense or legitimate act that the Defendant was in the process of unfairly towing the victim’s hand, and thus, constitutes a crime of injury.

C. The lower court’s sentence on the assertion of unreasonable sentencing (the fine of KRW 500,00) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. 1 First of all, we examine whether the defendant injured the victim's grandchildren, etc.

G was present at the court of the court below as a witness and stated that the defendant was directly present at the court of the court below as the key to the motor vehicle, but according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, including the victim and witness E and the witness E, the victim's hand, etc., generated from the key to the motor vehicle in his hand, and the victim's hand, etc., which occurred in a narrow space between parked motor vehicles and hull hull hull hull hus, could not be believed to have been easily seen due to the lack of credibility of the above statement, and the court of the court below also considered this.