(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.08.14 2013고정4230

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.08.14 2013고정4230

상해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On April 4, 2013, at around 16:03, the Defendant assaulted the victim on the face of the victim on the ground that the victim C(44 years of age) who participated in the on-site verification prior to the Human Automobile Information High School located in Bupyeong-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, Busan, would take a desire to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness C and D;

1. Statements made by witnesses E in the fourth trial records;

1. Application of statutes concerning the police interrogation protocol to the accused;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) 2 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. The summary of the facts charged in this part of the charges stated in the facts charged, and at the time and place indicated in the judgment, the Defendant told the victim C to “whether certain fingers will show content-certified mail,” and put the victim’s right hand hand and hand hand over to the right hand, which requires two caution treatment.

2. The Defendant asserts that there is no plucking, plucking, or plucking, of the victim from the investigative agency to this court.

The evidence consistent with the facts charged in this case includes the statement of the victim and the upper part photograph, but the following circumstances acknowledged by the record, namely, ① the location of this case was a place for on-site inspection, and two police officers (E and D) at the time were committed together with the defendant and the victim. The victim stated that E had made a statement that he did not plpl up the victim's hand, and that E did not pl up the victim's hand, but E and D stated that the defendant did not pl up or pl up the victim's hand, ② the victim stated that the victim was pleeped or pl up the victim's hand, and that the victim did not pl up the victim's hand, and that one right of investigation records submitted by the victim was 63, and that two rights of investigation records were 7 through 73.

참조조문

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 2014.10.24 2014노2966

-대구지방법원 2018.03.29 2017노5181

-부산지방법원 2015.05.21 2014고정4967

-인천지방법원 2015.01.30 2014노3803

-부산지방법원 2015.09.11 2015노1609