logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2018.10.31 2017고단500
사기등
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Defendant A’s status, etc.] A is a public official working as a leader in charge of planning and audit at the E-Gun planning and audit office located in Gangwon-do from February 2014 to August 19, 2015. Defendant B is a public official who was in charge of accounting in the above E-Gun planning and audit office from January 16, 2014 to August 21, 2015; Defendant B is a public official who operated the “H” in Gangwon-do and supplied office supplies to E-Gun and other government offices from around 2007 to around.

[The Defendants conspired with F in collusion with each other as indicated in the following individual criminal facts. The Defendants received a false estimate and false tax invoice as if they were supplied with office supplies, and prepared a false statement of purchase of goods, “written request for disbursement resolution,” and “written report for inspection of goods,” respectively, based on which they submitted it to the department in charge of expenditure, and submitted it to the victim E-Gun in charge of expenditure for the transfer of office supplies to F’s account, they received a refund of the remaining amount after deducting value added tax from the return of the amount of value added, and received it at will for the expenses of conference, business promotion, etc.

[Crimes by Defendants]

1. On October 6, 2014, the Defendants in collusion with F in preparing false official documents and holding false official documents, and at the planning and audit office of the E-Gun office located in Gangwon-gu, Gangwon-do, the fact was not found to have purchased administrative goods equivalent to KRW 1,336,50,00 from the above “H,” but was issued by F with false estimate and tax invoice, and based on such false estimate and tax invoice, the Defendants were issued by F, “the request for purchase of goods and the request for purchase,” “the disbursement resolution,” and “the list of goods inspection,” and written false statements as if they purchased the above price office goods, and submitted each of the above documents, which are official documents, to the accounting official in charge, and submitted them to the accounting official in charge, who was not aware that each of the above official documents was falsely prepared.

In this respect.

arrow