logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2019.05.29 2018고정32
허위공문서작성등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Status of the Defendant] From September 1, 2014 to January 8, 2017, the Defendant served as a general secretary in charge of accounting affairs at the Gosung-gun’s office; C is a person in charge of accounting affairs at the Gosung-gun’s office from January 15, 2016 to February 25, 2019; D is a person who operated the “F” at the Gosung-gun’s office; and D is a person who operated the “F” at the Gosung-gun’s office from around 2007 to from around 207.

[Public offering relation] The Defendant, in collusion with C and D, received a false estimate and a false tax invoice as if he was supplied with office supplies even without being supplied with office supplies from F, and then prepared a false invoice and a false tax invoice and submitted it to the expenditure department, respectively, and submitted it to the department in charge of expenditure, and then, when the victims high-income group remitted the amount of delivered office supplies to D account, the amount after deducting the value-added tax out of the amount was refunded to the victim high-income group, with the intention to arbitrarily use them in food expenses, business promotion expenses, etc.

[Specific Crime]

1. On January 26, 2016, the Defendant in collusion with C and D for the preparation of a false official document and the uttering of a false official document shall not purchase the office supplies equivalent to KRW 5,246,00 from D, even though he/she did not purchase the office supplies equivalent to KRW 5,246,00 from F, he/she received a false estimate and tax invoice from D, and based on such a false estimate and tax invoice, he/she entered the same falsely as if he/she purchased the office supplies as above, and made a false statement in the “written request for purchase of goods”, “the disbursement resolution”, and “written request for the inspection of goods”, and submitted them to H, who is a public official in charge, and had H approve approve of the fact that each of the above official documents was falsely prepared.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with C and D, refers to “goods purchased and requested,” which is an official document.

arrow