logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.10.19 2018나2027100
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is partly dismissed as follows. The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except where the plaintiff added a judgment on the newly asserted part by this court under paragraph (2). Thus, it is acceptable

Part II through 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "goods, art works, sports machinery, etc. owned by the plaintiff in the stairs of the above building, corridors, and sports machinery, etc." are as follows: "39 works of treaty-related stones owned by the plaintiff in the stairs, corridors, storages, etc. of the above building, 3 air-conditionings, 3 air-conditionings, Dogs, 10 fire-fightings, 10 CCTV, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2 (hereinafter referred to as the "goods in this case").

In the second sentence of the judgment of the first instance, "the facts received" in the 19th sentence shall be changed to "the facts for which the above summary order has become final and conclusive".

The 2nd to 3rd of the first instance judgment shall be dismissed as follows.

“However, evidence Nos. 2, 4, 5, and 8-18 of evidence Nos. 1, 1-5, and 8-18 of evidence Nos. 8, and some testimony of witness D of the court of first instance may be acknowledged by adding the whole purport of the pleadings to the testimony of the witness D of the court of first instance. In other words, D does not request a formal trial within the period of time after receiving the above summary order, and D does not have to make a request for a formal trial, and D does not have to do so in the court of first instance for cleaning the building in the corridor, stairs, and 5th floor of the building of this case.

(A) The Plaintiff testified to the effect that the remainder of the treaty-related works, etc. are left as the underground warehouse of the instant building, and the photographs (Evidence A2 does not appear most of the instant objects claimed by the Plaintiff) presented as evidence that D throw away the instant objects on the street.

arrow