The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a company representative of the facts charged, and is a person who uses Adi “B” at NAV, an Internet portal site.

On September 6, 2015, the Defendant, at around 23:32 on September 23, 2015, viewed the Defendant’s nameless member (AD E) explained the location, size, etc. of the bicycle shop as follows: (a) he visited the Defendant’s computer in Songpa-gu Seoul building; and (b) opened a knowledge-based bulletin board connected to the Defendant’s computer and searched data; and (c) opened the public notice board and searched the data.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in the column of comments that can be seen as a majority of the members who connected this place, inserted the Victim F, who is the owner of the said bicycle insertion business, “F, 48 years of age,” “I am feasc. I am fasc. I am fasc. I am fasc. I am fasc. I am am fasc. So, I am am again after I am dyec. I am dyec. I am back with the malicious comments that I am dyec. I am. I am fasc. I am. I am at this hole, and we am fasc. I am fasc. I am. I am. I am well fasc. I am. I am fasc. I am fasc.”

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

2. Determination

(a) An offense subject to prosecution on complaint (Article 312 (1) of the Criminal Act);

B. On August 29, 2016, the victim’s revocation of complaint after the instant indictment was instituted.

(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act);