logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2018.10.16 2018고단823
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On July 3, 2018, the Defendant damaged the property in a manner that, while under the influence of alcohol on the street in front of the “C” located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si B, Changwon-si, the Defendant 01:45, the Defendant: (a) was fluenced by the victim D for the use of a ero-mail owned by the victim D on the ground that the e-mail was obstructed by the Defendant’s front, thereby damaging the repair cost of KRW 430,160.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the time and place as referred to in Paragraph 1, said D’s 112 report was received and sent to the police box of Minsan Police Station F Station at the Minsan Police Station, which was called “S. . . . . . . . . . .. .. ... .... ... ....

As a result, the defendant assaulted police officers and interfered with their legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. G statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photography photographs and estimates;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of destroying property and the choice of fines) concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties and the selection of fines);

1. The provision of the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act (the punishment shall be aggravated for concurrent crimes with the punishment determined by a crime of interfering with the execution of heavier public duties);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment

arrow