Defendant

A and B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and by imprisonment for eight months, respectively.

except that from the date of this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A and Defendant B operated a game hall with the trade name “G Gameland” located in the F and the second floor in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, and Defendant B are those employed by Defendant A and have overall control over the management and operation of the game hall for the above period.

No one shall distribute, use, provide for use, exhibit or store game products with a content different from those of game products classified as a rating.

The game "for-use" was classified as a rating in order to obtain certain points on the screen by avoiding 20 types of interference, such as "use", "for-use", "for-use", and "rash" appearing on the game screen by a game user. However, the Defendants conspired with H, I, and employees in the name of H, I, and from March 29, 2016 to March 19, 200, provided the game products, the contents of which are modified so that many unspecified customers can use the modified game products so that they can obtain points if they meet the foregoing interference.

2. No one shall engage in the business of exchanging, arranging exchange or repurchase tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game water by Defendant B;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, in collusion with H, I, and his nameless employees, provided 40 games for “use” games installed therein at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) to the unspecified number of customers, and requested customers to refund the points they acquired in the game, and returned the amount calculated by deducting 10% commission from the amount calculated by deducting 10% commission from the amount calculated at the rate of 1 won per one point.

Accordingly, the defendant exchanged the result obtained by using game water.

3. The Defendant C, as described in paragraphs A and B, exchanged the outcome of the game and provided the altered game products so that customers can access the game. The Defendant, despite being aware of the fact that the content was modified, has control over the police.