Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 12:40 on November 19, 2013, the Defendant: (a) stated that “The victim D (year 44) who is a public official at the office located in the Gu-U.S. post office, prior to the Gu-U.S. C Building Security Office, sent registered goods sent to him/her in the efaF in the court; (b) on the ground that the victim cannot be said to be the recipient; (c) the victim was able to do so; and (d) the Defendant expressed his/her desire that “I will ask the victim of the efaba in the efaba, so that the damage would be caused if you are late, at the latest, at the time of the efabba, and at the latest, at the time of the efababba, the damage would be likely to occur; and (d) the victim’s shoulder who tried to conceal the efababba’s key by exposing his/her own key, and divided his/her key by assault the victim’s hand.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties related to the delivery of postal services by the victim, and at the same time, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the right shoulder, salted, etc. that requires treatment for about 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Each part of the protocol of suspect examination of the police against the accused (including D's statement);

1. Partial statement of the police statement against the defendant;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. Each police statement concerning G and D;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (as to attaching a standing photograph and a written diagnosis of injury, special service: In the case of attaching a seal to which it is to be delivered in order of delivery

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The assertion.