logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.11.24 2017고정498
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person driving a BCR100 two-wheeled vehicle.

1. On May 28, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of alcohol measurement) at around 15:48, the Defendant received a report from a person driving a vehicle driving on the street in front of the Korean Bank Training Institute at the 45th Emba-si, an Eup/Myeonn-si, an Eup/Myeonn-si, and controlled him/her on the charge of drinking on the charge of driving a vehicle on the ground of a person driving a vehicle.

When the police officer D went to the field, the defendant was placed in the left side of the training center, and the defendant was placed on the right side of the training center, which seems to be a drinking vehicle.

The defendant is divided into a large state of words and behavior, and the state of walking was a big big and red state of blood.

Whether a traffic control police officer driven alcohol to the defendant;

the Defendant’s answer to the question.

He/she was driven under the influence of alcohol, such as identifying who is in the military, and speaking for a police officer's questioning.

When there are reasonable grounds to determine the person, the Defendant requested for the measurement of drinking and the collection of blood, and the Defendant did not comply with the request four times from 16:10 to 16:25 on the same day without justifiable grounds.

2. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation shall operate any motor vehicle on the road, if it is not covered by mandatory insurance for motor vehicles;

Nevertheless, the defendant operated a two-wheeled vehicle that was not covered by mandatory insurance at the same time and place as the statement in Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Inquiry into each mandatory insurance;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Automobiles which are subscribed to mandatory insurance for facts constituting an offense under Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44-2 (2) of the Road Traffic Act), Article 46 (2) 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act, and the main sentence of Article 8 (2) of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act;

arrow