logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2016.11.10 2016고정375
전기공사업법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant works as the representative director of the indoor building construction business company C in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (302 indoor building construction business company).

1. A person who intends to operate an electrical construction business in violation of the Electrical Construction Business Act shall register with the Mayor/Do Governor;

Nevertheless, on July 23, 2013 and August 17, 2013, without registering the electrical construction business, the Defendant entered into a contract with the E University located in Pyeongtaek-si D for “F remodeling Construction” which is the construction contract amounting to 387,260,000, and around that time, the Defendant entered into an electrical construction work equivalent to 69,764,000 won at the said E University.

Accordingly, the defendant did not register the electrical construction business.

2. A person who intends to operate an information and communications construction business in violation of the Information and Communications Construction Business shall register with the Mayor/Do Governor;

Nevertheless, without being registered as an information and communications construction business, the Defendant contracted for “F remodeling construction work” which is the construction contract amounting to 387,260,000 as set forth in paragraph (1) at the time and place of paragraph (1). Around that time, the Defendant performed an information and communications construction work in an amount equivalent to 8,190,000 won

Accordingly, the defendant did not register an information and communications construction business.

3. A person who intends to conduct fire-fighting system installation business, etc. shall conduct fire-fighting system business by type of business to the Mayor/Do Governor;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without registering fire-fighting system installation business, contracted a construction contract for the building of the above E University, which is a specific fire-fighting object, at a time and place under Paragraph (1) and Paragraph (1). Around that time, the Defendant carried out fire-fighting system installation work equivalent to KRW 19,539,000, as well as KRW 387,260,000.

As a result, the defendant conducted fire-fighting system installation without registering fire-fighting system installation business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol of suspect examination of G police officers;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a written accusation and a written disposition of audit results;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow